Examiners should examine. Not gather.
AI agents pull the records, build the chain, flag the liens, and hand your examiner a complete package with every document linked to its source.
How many hours a week do your examiners spend gathering?
Thirty minutes with the engineer who builds these agents. No deck.
The hours before the judgment.
None of it needs an examiner. All of it lands on one.
- 01 Six portals, six logins, six different search syntaxes
- 02 A county site that's down, or only opens 9 to 4
- 03 Deeds arriving as scans that need reading page by page
- 04 Building the chain by hand in a spreadsheet
- 05 Cross-checking names and legal descriptions for variants
- 06 Rebuilding history that a prior starter already covered
Records pulled, not chased
Deeds, mortgages and related documents gathered from recorders, clerks, tax authorities and title plants at once.
A chain you can read
Conveyances traced and ordered into a clean chronology, so the history arrives structured instead of scattered.
Nothing slips past quietly
Open mortgages, tax liens and judgments surfaced and flagged for review, never silently resolved.
The whole picture, one place
Legal descriptions, parcel details, assessed values and tax status collected alongside the search.
Start from the last good point
Prior policies and starters located and matched, so nobody rebuilds fifty years of history that's already covered.
A package, not a pile
Everything compiled with a source link on every document, handed to your examiner to verify and determine.
What the agent hands your examiner
The chain arrives assembled and in order, with every instrument located and each open item marked. Nothing is resolved on the agent's own authority.
Here the 2016 deed of trust has no release of record, so it stays open. The 2009 tax lien does have a satisfaction, recorded in 2012, and the agent matched the two rather than leaving your examiner to find it.
The 1987 gap is the one that matters. A grantor and grantee mismatch across four years is exactly the sort of thing that needs judgment, so it is flagged for review rather than quietly bridged.
Retrieve
Records pulled from every available source.
AgentAssemble
Chain of title ordered and cross-checked.
AgentFlag
Possible defects surfaced, never resolved silently.
AgentExamine
Your examiner reads the package and the sources.
Your examinerDetermine
What's an exception, what's cured, what's insurable.
Your examinerCommit
Commitment drafted from the determination. Signed by you.
Agent prepsA package she can check, not a black box she has to trust
ALTA's March 2026 research found that a search routinely touches taxing authorities, the recorder, name indexes, courthouse records and assessment records, and that four in five purchase searches mean reading eleven documents or more. That is collection, not judgment. The agent takes it. It queries those sources in parallel, reads what comes back, and orders the conveyances into a chain instead of a folder of scans.
What arrives is structured. Every document carries a link back to the record it came from, so the examiner spot-checks rather than re-searches. Encumbrances are flagged and left flagged, because clearing them is a determination and determinations are hers. Where coverage is thin or a scan is illegible, the package says so in plain terms rather than presenting a gap as a clean result.
An agent that quietly resolves a lien is worse than no agent at all. This one is built to raise its hand, not to look confident.
Your sources, your system
Results land where your team already works.
Coverage and integration depth vary by jurisdiction, system and version. We confirm exactly what is supported for your markets and your setup during the workflow audit.
Every flag is traceable
- ✓ Source link on every retrieved document
- ✓ The agent flags, it never clears a defect on its own
- ✓ Coverage gaps reported, not quietly skipped
- ✓ US-hosted, encrypted, never used to train any model
- ✓ Built to support your obligations under ALTA Best Practices Pillar 3
Discovery call
Your search volume, your counties, where the gathering costs you.
Workflow audit
We review real search files and define exactly what the agent retrieves and flags.
Build & train
Tuned on your records and property types, against your own exam standards.
Go live
Connected to your sources and system with examiner review built in.
We give you a timeline for your own build after the workflow audit, once we have seen your county mix and your exam standards.
What if the agent misses a lien?
The agent doesn't make the determination, your examiner does, on a package where every document links to its source. It is built to over-flag rather than under-flag, and it reports gaps in coverage instead of quietly skipping them. Liability sits exactly where it sits today: with your examiner and your underwriter.
Does this replace our examiners?
No. It removes the gathering that happens before the examining. The point is to give the hours back, and how you spend them is your call.
What does it cost?
A monthly platform fee plus a per-search rate that scales with volume. You get a firm number after the workflow audit, before committing to anything.
Which sources can it search?
County recorder and clerk records, tax authorities, and title plant data where you have access. Coverage varies by jurisdiction, so we confirm your specific markets during the audit and say plainly what cannot be automated.
What about handwritten or poor-quality scans?
Older records are read where legible and flagged for manual review where they aren't. The agent never guesses at a name or legal description it cannot read cleanly.
How long until it's working?
We start with one property type and a subset of counties, then widen from there. You get a dated timeline for your own build after the workflow audit, not before.
Ready to get started?
Book a free discovery call and we will map how agentic AI can fit your workflows.